Literature Review & Poster/Visual Presentation Peer Feedback Form
Your Name ____________________________
Presenter’s Name___________________________
Date__________________
QUESTIONS & COMMENTS: As you listen to each presentation, please use the space below to make notes. As you listen and observe, consider:
A) Questions and lines of thought you’d like to pursue during the Q & A session
B) Particular strengths of the presentation in terms of content as well as style
C) Suggestions, if any, you have for the speaker regarding the presentation. Suggestions may pertain to presentation style or content.
Content:
Style:
Instructions to reviewer: Use these criteria to rate the poster presentation on a scale of 1-5 (1=strongly disagree; 3=neutral; 5=strongly agree).
Appearance
1. Display attracts viewer’s attention 1 2 3 4 5
2. Words are easy to read from an appropriate distance. 1 2 3 4 5
3. Poster is well organized and easy to follow 1 2 3 4 5
4. Graphics and other visuals enhance presentation 1 2 3 4 5
5. The poster is neat, appealing to look at and free of unnecessary detail 1 2 3 4 5
Content
6. Content was clear and easy to understand 1 2 3 4 5
7. Purpose (the research question being addressed) was stated clearly 1 2 3 4 5
8. Information presented was interesting and valuable 1 2 3 4 5
9. There was enough detail without overwhelming listener with facts & statistics 1 2 3 4 5
10. The approach taken was appropriate for the subject matter of the presentation 1 2 3 4 5
11. Conclusions were stated clearly 1 2 3 4 5
Presentation
12. Voice was loud, clear and expressive 1 2 3 4 5
13. Presentation maintained a good pace and flow 1 2 3 4 5
14. Presenter exhibited a good rapport with audience 1 2 3 4 5
15. Presenter’s response to questions demonstrated knowledge of chosen topic 1 2 3 4 5
16. Overall, this was an excellent poster presentation 1 2 3 4 5