I think I’ll present
Interaction and representational integration: Evidence from speech errors by Matthew Goldrick, H. Ross Baker, Amanda Murphy, Melissa Baese-Berk. It can be found here: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.006
I think I’ll present Elman 1998, Generalization, simple recurrent networks, and the emergence of structure, from the annotated bibliography Joe put up.
It’s about whether we need our phonological representations to specify variables, or whether we can do without. It’s a horribly-written paper that disguises a very clever experiment with great results and a convincing analysis.
It’s quite long, so I’ll be ignoring their treatment of exceptions, which is really too bad, because they even factored THOSE into their experimental design . . .
I think I’ll present
Interaction and representational integration: Evidence from speech errors by Matthew Goldrick, H. Ross Baker, Amanda Murphy, Melissa Baese-Berk. It can be found here:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.006
I think I’ll present Elman 1998, Generalization, simple recurrent networks, and the emergence of structure, from the annotated bibliography Joe put up.
I’ll present Seidenberg and Elman’s 1999 response to Marcus et al.’s rule-learning results.
I’ll be representing Marcus.
Marcus, G. F. (1995). Children’s overregularization of English plurals: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Child Language, 22(2), 447-60.
I’ll be presenting Berent, Everett and Shimron 2001, which can be found here:
http://www.psych.neu.edu/faculty/i.berent/pubs/11%20phonological_reps.pdf
It’s about whether we need our phonological representations to specify variables, or whether we can do without. It’s a horribly-written paper that disguises a very clever experiment with great results and a convincing analysis.
It’s quite long, so I’ll be ignoring their treatment of exceptions, which is really too bad, because they even factored THOSE into their experimental design . . .