Also, I’ve stumbled upon a MA thesis, that might be relevant to the topics that we’ve discussed in class. I’m posting its data here, case somebody might be interested:
“From alternations to ordered rules: A system for learning Derivational Phonology” (2010) by Marc Simpson (Concordia University)
Abstract: “This work presents a computational rule learner tasked with inferring underlying forms and ordered rules from phonological paradigms akin to those found in traditional pen and paper analyses. The scheme being proposed is a batch learner capable of analysing surface alternations and hypothesising ordered derivations compatible with them in order to create an explicit mapping from UR to SR.” http://0branch.com/linguistics/pdf/ma-thesis.pdf
Dear all,
I’ll present V. Kapatsinsly’s “Attending to phonotactics over alternations in learning morphophonology”.(under review)
http://pages.uoregon.edu/vkapatsi/VKpoVsoLg2.0.pdf
Also, I’ve stumbled upon a MA thesis, that might be relevant to the topics that we’ve discussed in class. I’m posting its data here, case somebody might be interested:
“From alternations to ordered rules: A system for learning Derivational Phonology” (2010) by Marc Simpson (Concordia University)
Abstract: “This work presents a computational rule learner tasked with inferring underlying forms and ordered rules from phonological paradigms akin to those found in traditional pen and paper analyses. The scheme being proposed is a batch learner capable of analysing surface alternations and hypothesising ordered derivations compatible with them in order to create an explicit mapping from UR to SR.”
http://0branch.com/linguistics/pdf/ma-thesis.pdf
I think I’ll present Daland et al 2011, Explaining Sonority Projection Effects.