Post comments on the readings for Thurs. Oct. 27th here.

Post comments on the readings for Tues. Oct.25th here.

I just came across this unpublished ms. by Halle that Tobias Scheer seems to have preserved for posterity. It’s a very nice discussion of the (non-)connection between affixes’ cyclic status and the  level at which they are added.

Update: See Cole’s (1995) Handbook of Phonology article on Cyclicity for an overview of subsequent analyses of Diyari and Vedic Sanskrit, as well as other useful related material.

Please post a comment on one of the readings for Oct. 22.

Please post a comment on Bobaljik or McCarthy’s paper.

Please tell us in comments what you’ll present on Oct. 13th, and provide links if possible.

Please post a comment on something from the readings from week 5. If it’s on Bermudez-Otero, please post by the end of the day Sunday, and if it’s on McCarthy, please post by the end of the day Wednesday.

I just came across some potentially useful materials on DEEs. Burzio’s Companion chapter, and a recent handout by Inkelas (which explicitly discusses the relation between morpheme-specific phonology and DEEs).

Please post your comments here on Pater 2000/Kiparsky 2007.

Please add as comments the papers you will present, as well as links to them if available.