Implications of Fake News

Hearing the term “fake news” has become common in the media. This concept was hard for me to grasp because I have always thought of the news to be factual, a place where I didn’t have to question the content I was hearing or seeing. I think that this trust not only comes from a long history between the people and the media, but also from laziness. Many people have so many things going on in their daily lives that they can’t even keep up within their own bubbles. Educating yourself about current events and staying up to date with important information takes time and the news provides the option for people to not have to invest this time.

So when the term “fake news” began to spread it became another task that people needed to do if they wanted to consume news. They had to teach themselves how to spot fake news.

I learned of the implications of fake news in regards to the 2016 US Presidential Election. For example, one of the most widespread  fake news articles said that the Pope had endorsed Trump with an engagement of over 2 million people on Facebook alone. This is not the only fake news story to have such large reach, there are many others that also had implications of their own.

However as I was exploring the internet for information on fake news, I came across this TED talk given by Stephanie Busari, a journalist and editor at CNN International Digital.

Stephanie’s story illuminates implications of fake news that I hadn’t thought about yet. Not only does this inaccurate information ignite action, but it also deters it. The lack of representation and information in the news is just as, if not more significant than what we do see.

But what can the concerned news consumer do? Well firstly is to be cognizant of the signs of fake news and reporting it when you come across it in your social media. Also it is important to determine which news sources you trust and identifying why that it. Take some time to do research as to who funds the companies, what are the themes seen throughout the content reported, and what efforts are they taking to ensure legitimacy. According to this 2014 study, BBC was the most trusted news source of the time.

What news sources do you rely on and do you think you have potentially spread fake news?

 

Spotting Fake News

Facebook has been under fire regarding the news feed for users, in particular the spreading of fake news stories. In reply to this, Facebook News Feed and PR teams have been working tirelessly to inform users that this is not Facebook’s intent and how the users can avoid reading and spreading this content.

Recently when I opened Facebook on my phone, the top of the page was a message with a message grabbing my attention saying, “How to spot fake news” as seen below.

It grasped my attention enough to make me click on it and continue to read on the topic. They included a lot of resources and steps that people can take when trying to spot fake news.

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I found it interesting that Facebook set this up so that it would be the first thing users see when they open the app the day that they had this scheduled. In a way I felt like this was a direct response to the large amount of complaints and bad press they have been having around the issue. It feels like they are trying to push it in peoples faces

Facebook made it incredibly easy for the user to learn about spotting fake news although this effort does not inform people about how big of a problem the “fake news” epidemic is right now.

Buzzed news created an analysis of the top 20 fake and real news stories during the 2016 Election. They  found that the fake news stories had greater engagement than the legitimate ones by over 1 million users.

image source

Spotting fake news requires EFFORT and many social media users aren’t looking to put this in for an issue that they don’t realize is such a big deal. Would you go through the effort to report a news story that you thought to be Fake News?