Monthly Archives: April 2019

Rolle, Lionnet & Faytak (2019) – Areal patterns in the vowel systems of the Macro-Sudan Belt

Areal patterns in the vowel systems of the Macro-Sudan Belt
Nicholas Rolle, Florian Lionnet, Matthew Faytak
direct link: http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/004515
March 2019
This paper investigates the areal distribution of vowel systems in the Macro-Sudan Belt, an area of Western and Central Africa proposed in recent areal work (Güldemann 2008, 2010, 2011, 2018b, Clements & Rialland 2008). We report on a survey of 681 language varieties with entries coded for two phonological features: advanced tongue root (ATR) harmony and the presence of interior vowels (i.e. non-peripheral vowels [? ? ? ? ? …]). Our results show that the presence of ATR harmony in the Macro-Sudan Belt is limited to three geographically unconnected zones: an Atlantic ATR zone, a West African ATR zone, and an East African ATR zone. Between the West and East African ATR Zones is a genetically heterogeneous region where ATR harmony is systematically absent which we term the Central African ATR-deficient zone. Our results show that in this same Central African zone, phonemic and allophonic interior vowels are disproportionately prevalent. Based on this distribution, we highlight two issues. First, ATR and interiority have an antagonistic relationship and do not commonly co-occur within vowel systems, supported through statistical tests. Second, our survey supports the existence of the Macro-Sudan Belt, but the discontinuous distribution of ATR harmony and its systematic absence in Central Africa challenges the proposal that this area represents the ‘hotbed’ of the Macro-Sudan Belt (Güldemann 2008:167).

Breiss & Hayes (2019) – Phonological markedness effects in sentence formation

Phonological markedness effects in sentence formation
Canaan Breiss, Bruce P. Hayes
direct link: http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/004487
January 2019
Earlier research has found that phonological markedness constraints (for example, against stress clash or sibilant sequences) statistically influence speakers’ choices between particular syntactic constructions and between synonymous words. In this study, we test phonological constraints not just in particular cases, but across the board. We employ a novel method that uses a MaxEnt grammar to model the distribution of WORD BIGRAMS (consecutive two-word sequences) and how this distribution is influenced by phonological constraints. Our study of multiple corpora indicates that several phonological constraints do indeed play a statistically significant role in English sentence formation. We also show that by examining particular subsets of the corpora we can diagnose the mechanisms whereby phonologically marked sequences come to be underrepresented. We conclude by discussing modes of grammatical organization compatible with our findings.

Format: [ pdf ]
Reference: lingbuzz/004515
(please use that when you cite this article)
Published in: Accepted to Linguistic Typology
keywords: phonological typology, vowel systems, vowel harmony, atr, macro-areas, areal linguistics, africa, phonology
Format: [ pdf ]
Reference: lingbuzz/004487
(please use that when you cite this article)
Published in: submitted
keywords: markedness, phrasal phonology, syntax-phonology interface, grammatical architectures, maximum entropy grammars, phonology