Transparency, locality, and contrast in Uyghur backness harmony
Adam McCollum
direct link: http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/004839
October 2019
Theories of vowel harmony have wrestled with the formal challenges of transparency, notably the increased expressivity of non-local dependencies. However, experimental work has demonstrated on a number of occasions that ‘transparent’ vowels actually undergo harmony (e.g. Gick, Pulleyblank, Campbell, & Mutaka, 2006), re-establishing the role of locality in the analysis of harmony. Transparency has also been shown to be constrained by count effects – a single token of a vowel may be transparent but multiple tokens are not (Hayes & Londe, 2006; Ringen & Kontra, 1989). However, existing work on backness harmony in Uyghur argues that harmony truly skips the high front vowel /i/ and is unaffected by multiple tokens of transparent /i/. This paper examines the distribution of [i] and [?] within roots and suffixes to assess their phonological status, as well as their participation in harmony. Results indicate there are no transparent vowels in Uyghur, as [i] and [?] regularly alternate for harmony. This finding is interpreted as further support for the role of locality in harmony more generally.
Format: | [ pdf ] |
Reference: | lingbuzz/004839 (please use that when you cite this article) |
Published in: | |
keywords: | phonology, vowel harmony, locality, transparency, contrast, uyghur, phonology |