LING611: Psychological background to linguistic theories (Spring 2021)

  • Instructor: Brian Dillon & Shota Momma
  • Location: Zoom
  • Time: MW 4:00pm – 5:15pm
  • Office hours: after each class and by appointment

Course overview

This course is an introductory-level course in psycholinguistics. We will investigate linguistic computation in language perception and production, in the context of broader debates in cognitive science, such as the role of abstraction, categorization and probability, and the various architectural properties of information processing systems (modularity vs. interactivity, structure sensitivity, serial vs. parallel computation, etc.). We will examine these issues applied to language use in diverse contexts, from speech perception to the understanding of language in discourse. We will pay particular attention to how these issues interface with topics in other areas of linguistic theory, and broad perspectives on the relationship between mental grammar and real-time language processing and production.

As part of the course, students will be introduced to some of the core technical tools in the psycholinguist’s toolkit, including working with common software for programming experiments, and the analysis and presentation of experimental data.

Learning Objectives

  • Understand the foundational issues that have shaped the fields of linguistics and psycholinguistics.
  • Develop familiarity with current research and key findings in psycholinguistics.
  • Acquire the quantitative skills necessary to critically evaluate psycholinguistic studies.
  • Gain proficiency in the experimental methodologies commonly used in psycholinguistic research.

Requirements

  • Attendance (10%): Attend biweekly class meetings, having read the required reading (see the schedule below).
  • Presentations (20%): Give two presentations on the required readings, and one presentation on your final project.
  • Lab assignments (20%): Details will be communicated in class, but you will be asked to complete two lab assignments, one on categorical perception in speech, and the other on syntactic priming in production.
  • Final project (50%): Write an APA-style literature review, a theoretical paper, or an experimental proposal as your final paper (10-15 pages, double-spaced).

Schedule (tentative)

DateTopicReadingsLab activitiesSlides
Introduction: Competence and performanceMarr (1982): Chapter 1
Chomsky (1965): Chapter 1
Phillips (1996): Chapter 5
Slides
Abstraction and categorizationDiehl et al. (2004)
Pisoni & Tash (1974)
Lab 1 introductionSlides
Abstraction and categorizationMcMurray et al. (2002)Lab 1 check-inSlides
Storage vs. computationVitevich & Luce (1999)

Norris et al. (2002)
Slides
Storage vs. computationSprenger et al. (2006)Lab 1 dueSlides
Abstraction in syntaxBock & Loebell (1990)
Ziegler et al. (2019)
Slides
NoneLab 2 introduction
Interactivity & competitionMarslen-Wilson (1987)
Dahan (2010)
Slides
Interactivity & competitionCutting & Ferreira (1992)
Morsella & Miozzo (2002)
Slides
Interactivity & competitionTrueswell (1994)
Clifton et al. (2003)
Slides
Interactivity & competitionFerreira (1996)
Dell & O'Seaghdha (1994)
Slides
Interactivity & competitionStaub et al. (2018)
Pizarro-Guevara & Wagers (2020)
Lab 2 check-in
Lab 2 discussionNoneLab 2 due
Grammar in real timePhillips et al. (2011)
Wagers et al. (2009)
3/24Grammar in real timeFerreira & Swets (2005)
3/29Grammar in real timeMomma & Yoshida (in prep)
3/31MeaningGleitman et al. (2007)
Bunger et al (2013)
4/5MeaningFerreira (2019)Lab 3 introduction
4/7Meaning in contextTanenhaus et al. (1995)
Sedivy et al. (1999)
4/12Meaning in contextHuang & Snedeker (2009)
Grodner et al. (2010)
4/14GradienceHale (2001)
Levy (2013)
4/19GradienceArmstrong & Gleitman (1983)
Bresnan & Nikitinna (2008)
Morgan & Levy (2016)
4/21Presentation/Joint discussion with Gaja's classTBA
4/26Presentation/Joint discussion with Gaja's classTBALab 3 due
4/28Presentation/Joint discussion with Gaja's classTBA

Grading scale

A         93-100

A-        90-92

B+       87-89

B         83-86

B-        80-82

C+      77-79

C         73-76

F          0-72

Academic honesty statement

Since the integrity of the academic enterprise of any institution of higher education requires honesty in scholarship and research, academic honesty is required of all students at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Academic dishonesty is prohibited in all programs of the University. Academic dishonesty includes but is not limited to: cheating, fabrication, plagiarism, and facilitating dishonesty. Appropriate sanctions may be imposed on any student who has committed an act of academic dishonesty. Instructors should take reasonable steps to address academic misconduct. Any person who has reason to believe that a student has committed academic dishonesty should bring such information to the attention of the appropriate course instructor as soon as possible. Instances of academic dishonesty not related to a specific course should be brought to the attention of the appropriate department Head or Chair. Since students are expected to be familiar with this policy and the commonly accepted standards of academic integrity, ignorance of such standards is not normally sufficient evidence of lack of intent (http://www.umass.edu/dean_students/codeofconduct/acadhonesty/).

Accomodation statement

The University of Massachusetts Amherst is committed to providing an equal educational opportunity for all students. If you have a documented physical, psychological, or learning disability on file with Disability Services (DS), you may be eligible for reasonable academic accommodations to help you succeed in this course. If you have a documented disability that requires an accommodation, please notify me within the first two weeks of the semester so that we may make appropriate arrangements. For more information, consult the Disability Services website at http://www.umass.edu/disability/.

Skip to toolbar