The colon as a separate prosodic category: Tonal evidence from Paicî (Oceanic, New Caledonia)
Florian Lionnet
direct link: http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/004265
October 2018
Most recent work in metrical theory rejects the colon (?) —a constituent intermediate between the foot and the prosodic word and made of two feet: ?????(??)Ft(??)Ft ?{(??)Ft(??)Ft}?— as a separate category in the Prosodic Hierarchy (PH: ????Ft???PrWd), arguing that it is unnecessary and too costly (e.g. Ellenbaas and Kager 1999; Hyde 2002; Martínez-Paricio and Kager 2015, 2016, a.o.). I analyze an unusual downstep pattern in Paicî (Oceanic) and show that the most satisfying account of this pattern involves reference to the colon. Paicî is a two-tone language (H vs. L), where L-toned words of 4+ morae undergo register lowering after the second mora (/????????/ ? [????!????]). This downstep does not occur with shorter words. I show that the two initial morae of 4?+ words are parsed into a bimoraic foot. Crucially, no foot is parsed in 2? or 3? words. I argue that foot-parsing can only occur if it creates feet that are licensed by a colon (hence the need for at least 4?), making the Paicî downstep pattern the first piece of tonal evidence in favor of the colon.