post

Teamwork, lectures, and teamwork!

by Anna Bobbitt

In week 9 of our semester, we worked on fine tuning and unifying our CAD drawings. Monday of this week (3/31) was spent listening to a fantastic lecture from Lia Douillet, a HERS rater. We learned about HERS – Home Energy Rating System – and the softwares used to get the rating. HERS is a great tool to quantify the energy and carbon usage of a functioning home and for understanding what kind of energy sustainability a household has. In Massachusetts the minimum HERS rating for new construction is 42 for a fossil fuel based build, and 45 for an all-electric. There are more sustainable standards that, when met, are rewarded by Mass Save with energy efficiency incentives. As a HERS rater, Lia assesses new builds at the halfway point for construction and at completion. She then gives the home a set of scores that combine to get the HERS rating.

Our HERS and BEAM (software to measure embodied carbon) team were able to meet with Lia to get some deeper insight on the software while the rest of us met to present our work up to that point. For this meeting, and the past week, we have mostly been focused on nailing down a floor plan. Or, at the very least confirming enough of it that the section, elevation, and interiors team can start to line up some of their work with the general layout of the home. We discussed some proposals for the floor plan and determined some ways for the teams to work directly to ensure effectiveness and collaboration.

On Wednesday of this week (4/2) we enjoyed another lecture, this time from Carl Fiocchi on MEP (Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing) systems. We focused mostly on the history of residential heating and cooling systems as well as what the numbers are for carbon usage and CO2 emissions. We also looked at the intended heating and cooling systems for the build which is a very simple unit built into the wall framing that focuses on efficiency and lots of fresh air flow.

After the lecture, the floor plan and interiors team met to nail down two different options for the floor plan. The basement stair will be on the NE side of the building with the bathroom across the hall and the bedroom in the SE corner to maximize natural light. The kitchen-living took up most of the conversation with one option including a U shaped kitchen in the SW corner and the other with a linear kitchen on the North wall. We are still working on creating a balance between entry, kitchen, dining, and living space but with some fine tuning I think we will have some great options. We were also introduced to a new organization and collaboration system with specific file naming and cross referencing so we are all working on cohesive CAD documents. We closed the week with some updates from all the teams and action steps moving forward. Especially looking at the deadlines for the window schedule and BEAM numbers!

post

A Big Week: Presenting Our Housing Ideas

by Marvelous Akande

It is Week 6 of the 2025 DesignBuild. This week was a significant milestone for our class as we had the opportunity to present our housing ideas to the client. Throughout the week, we refined our concepts, received feedback, and prepared for the big review.

Monday: Discussion, Desk Review, and Final Preparations

We began the week with a discussion on two assigned readings: The Modern American House – The Small House Era by Isenstadt and Home Delivery by Barry Bergdoll. Our conversation explored the history of various housing typologies, the evolution of residential architecture, and the role of prefabrication in housing development. These discussions provided valuable historical context and insight into how past innovations influence contemporary housing design and what the roles of architects have been.

Following this, we had a desk review session with our professor. Each group presented updates on their progress, reviewed the key requirements for the upcoming client presentation, and continued refining their designs. This session allowed us to align our work with project expectations, address any lingering questions, and make final adjustments before the big presentation

Wednesday: Client Presentation at Holyoke Housing Authority

The highlight of the week was our visit to the Holyoke Housing Authority office, where we met with our clients, Damaris and Pedro, along with a few professionals in the field. Each of the four groups presented their unique housing concepts, showcasing different ideas and design approaches. The client provided thoughtful feedback, which will guide the next phase of our work.

What’s Next?

After spring break, our class will shift from working in separate groups to collaborating as a whole. Using the feedback from Damaris and Pedro, we will consolidate our ideas into a single house design that best meets the needs and wants of the client.

post

Rethinking Home: Small Spaces, Big Ideas

By Krashang Giri Goswami

This week in Design Build Studio, we started with a discussion on The Modern American House: Spaciousness and Middle-Class Identity (Isenstadt, 2006)—a reading that made us rethink what “home” really means. The idea of the small house has always been more than just a response to space constraints; it’s a reflection of cultural values, economic policies, and personal identity. In mid-century America, small homes were designed to project efficiency, stability, and a sense of belonging. But what happens when we step outside of that historical framework and design for real people, with real stories—like Pedro and Damaris?

That’s where things got exciting. We split into teams of four, each tasked with developing a unique take on their future home. And let’s just say, no two houses looked the same. Some teams leaned into the familiar—a classic gable roof, a layout that felt intuitive, warm, and traditional. Others pushed for something bolder, testing out modernist forms that played with asymmetry, angles, and dynamic spaces.

Prof. Darling guiding the team of (L-R) Omar, Anna, Nat and Ivy; Picture by Krashang Giri Goswami

Concepts ranged from homes that blend seamlessly into the surroundings to ones that make a statement, challenging conventional ideas of what a small house should look like. The best part? Every single design had Pedro and Damaris at the center, ensuring that these weren’t just exercises in aesthetics, but real proposals rooted in their needs and preferences.

Bianca and Lily explaining their team’s idea; Picture by Jacob Agoglia

As we wrapped up our in-house presentations, the energy in the room was high. Seeing the sheer variety of ideas made us even more excited about the next step—presenting the options to Pedro and Damaris next week. Their feedback will shape the direction we take moving forward, and we can’t wait to hear their thoughts. Stay tuned for next week’s update—because this house is just getting started!

post

Concept Designs

by Jacob Agoglia

This past week, the DesignBuild students were each tasked with creating an individual “concept design” based on our site, the clients, the dimensions constraints, as well as our creative instincts around designing a small home. Understanding the site, its opportunities, and issues was the first step. Building on our site research and preliminary design for the location and placement of the building on our site we were able to craft floor plan layouts that complimented the site plan. Considering pedestrian access, solar gain, and the clients wishes gave structure to these concepts as we looked at the design from different angles. Presenting each of our individual ideas to the class allowed us to find common themes in our designs and ultimately form groups of four to develop our designs into more mature proposals.

Ava showing her mono-slope/clerestory concept

Our next step is to work in groups to refine 4 different schematic designs to bring to the client at midterm review. We are examining site plan, floor plans, elevations, materials, and even roof structures. There has been excellent teamwork thus far, and students are looking forward to presenting their hard work to the clients when we meet with them in Holyoke next week.

Lily reviewing circulation patterns; important even in a small space!

Teamwork and collaboration have been – and continue to be – a critical to the DesignBuild project. By analyzing each of our individual concepts and incorporating the best ideas from each approach, we have not only strengthened our designs but also our skills as collaborative designers.

                  

post

Precedent Studies: Analysis and AutoCAD

by Ivy Ackerman

This week began with the introduction of 8 small home precedent studies which are successful examples of sustainable, affordable, and diverse housing types. Our class was grouped in pairs, (one architecture student and one building construction technology student) and assigned to complete informational presentation boards to discuss and highlight each precedent, providing information on topics such as: what are other successful projects completed by the builder?, What features are unique or innovative? How does this project achieve energy efficiency? And what key aspects from this project can we use to influence our own work in this studio?

Diagraming the spaces of our neighbor home; another Habitat for Humanity project.

Our precedent studies additionally asked us to create a drawing set of each small home using AutoCAD. This set includes a floor plan, two elevations, building section and wall detail section. Our class chose to use AutoCAD in order to allow partner groups to work simultaneously on separate drawings that could be referenced into one another via XREF command. Our working class days allowed us to troubleshoot in order to ensure that referenced drawings were updating timely, allowing additional drawings to be as accurate as possible. Later in the week, our class learned how to export our digital drawings as printable PDFs that utilized a print layout that accurately translated line weights according to layer.

A very clean wall section from the Cedar Cottage ADU precedent

On Monday, groups gave a brief presentation on their respective precedent study, including their drawing set. This session was highly engaging, as many of the precedents directly reflected strategies and solutions that can be directly applied to the work we are doing in the studio. Presentations included a variety of construction techniques, sustainability strategies, affordability approaches and massing/plan layouts. By using and creating drawing sets in AutoCAD, each group was able to further understand each precedent, and the building methods used.