32. Monday, November 23, 2009

Read Ch 8 (386 – 391)

Book HW (Ch 8): 69, 88

OWLs:   due Wed., November 24

Look for OWLs due on Sunday Night

Below is the screen-capture of what was probably the suckiest lecture of the year.

Nov 23

Nov 23 -

5 thoughts on “32. Monday, November 23, 2009

  1. Jason Todd

    Professor Knapp,

    Can you please post the video from November 23, I was unable to make it to class that day.

    Thank you

  2. chem111-mjknapp Post author

    Ahhhh, ATP.

    The reaction is actually exothermic, but you have to consider the other reactants:

    ATP +H2O –> ADP + P

    “ATP” is kinda like this” Adenine-O(PO2)-O(PO2)-O(PO2)-OH, where each O(PO2) group has a negative 1 charge (so the three phosphate groups of ATP has an overall -3 charge). To make ADP, you just add H-O-H across the final P-O-P bonds, which makes ADP and phosphate: [HO-(PO2)-OH]2-, also written as [H2PO4]1-. The net bonding change is to break these bonds:P-O and H-O; you make these: P-O and H-O. Although this looks like zero change in bond energy, it turns out the P-O bonds are not all of equal stability. The P-O bond is less stable in ATP due to the presence of so many negative charges in ATP, while the P-O bond in [H2PO4]1- is much more stable!

  3. Andrew

    Hmm I guess I just need to get it in my head that it takes energy to break a bond, and energy is released when one is formed.

    When I think of this situation, the first thing that comes to mind is ATP. When ATP breaks into ADP + P, energy is released, isn’t it? Is this an exception?

  4. chem111-mjknapp Post author

    Hi Andrew,
    you’re half way there: energy is required to break the bonds of the reactants, and energy is released when you form bonds for the products. But there’s a mis-statement in your initial premise that is giving you fits. If you re-stated your premise, you’d be in good shape: “if weaker reactant bonds break to form stronger product bonds, the reaction is more exothermic.”

  5. Andrew

    I’m having trouble understanding this concept:

    Weaker product bonds forming stronger reactant bonds yields MORE exothermic reactions.

    This doesn’t make sense to me… Wouldn’t the energy in the broken product bonds need to be used to form the new bond?

    Can anyone help me conceptualize this?

    Thanks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *